Skip to site navigation

Important notice: by continuing to use our site you are deemed to have accepted our privacy and cookie policy

Behaviour of severed rhizomorphs

Advertise here
Support the RHS

Support the RHS

Help us to continue our plant research projects.

Join the RHS
Buy as a gift

Behaviour of severed rhizomorphs of Armillaria mellea and A. gallica in growing media

Lead scientist
Liz Beal
Start date
2007
End date
2011
Keywords

Armillaria, honey fungus, rhizomorphs

Benefits to gardeners

The results derived from this work will be able to be used directly for advising on the best approach for replanting after a case of Armillaria has been confirmed.

The problem

Replanting after the removal of a host of Armillaria can be very difficult, as removal of all sources of inoculum is almost impossible unless it was a contained growing area, such as a pot, where all the soil can be removed. Therefore current advice suggests removal of the infected plant and if replanting in the area to use a less susceptible species.

However, the hosts of Armillaria tend to be trees and woody shrubs, often used as focal points, which are usually replanted with something similar. Therefore it is hoped that this work will enable us to better tailor the advice we can provide on this disease by understanding how any remaining inoculum may behave in the soil.
 

Approach

The factors currently being tested are the size of the piece of severed rhizomorph, the species of Armillaria, the growing media, and the length of time. These all relate to practical steps a gardener could take once their infected plant has been removed.

If the gardener was to rotovate the surrounding soil, after plant removal, would this help by reducing the size of the remaining rhizomorphs? To answer this question we are using two lengths of rhizomorph.

The species, once identified, may make a large difference to the advice given as the rhizomorphs of species such as A. gallica, behave in a very different way to those of other species, such as A. mellea.

Previous work suggests the rhizomorphs of A. mellea are short-lived, and often not used for infection; whereas those of A. gallica are seen to be produced much more frequently, and further from the original food source, as these are one of the main infection structures for this species. These differences would greatly affect the treatment of a site after infected plant removal.

The differing experimental growing media would help us understand whether soil enrichment, once the host plant was removed, could help suppress the rhizomorph growth. For this reason a loam is being used to model a quite ordinary soil, and then for comparison a compost derived from municipal waste collections, as this will hopefully model the compost made and used by gardeners.

Time is obviously an important factor. If the rhizomorphs are severed from their food source but can remain viable indefinitely in the soil, it would be important to never replant that area with a susceptible species, however if after time they ceased to be viable it would allow a gardener to replant with their choice. The rhizomorphs in this experiment are assessed on a regular basis to check for growth and viability.
 

Further information

Read about honey fungus

Read about the studies on the pathogenicity of Armillaria spp.

Read about the identification of Armillaria spp using molecular methods

Read about the effect of abiotic factors on Armillaria growth

Read about the growth and behaviour of Armillaria in mulches

View the Armillaria survey

References

Pérez Sierra A and Gorton C (2005). Survival of honey fungus in wood and bark chip mulches. The Plantsman vol. 4, 204- 207 (PDF)

Pérez Sierra A (2003). Systematics, diagnostics and epidemiology of the fungal genus Armillaria. PhD thesis, University of London
 

Advertise here

Wild About Gardens

Wild About Gardens

Want to know more about how you can make your garden a great place for wildlife.  Wild About Gardens has a wealth of information.