Publications
RHS Journals
The Orchid Review
 |
The Orchid Review is the oldest and most influential orchid magazine in the world and essential reading for anyone with a passion for orchids. It is more than 100 years old and, in 1993, it became the orchid journal of the Royal Horticultural Society. The Orchid Review is published in six issues a year and edited by Isobyl la Croix.
Click here
for the lists of contents from the March 2001 issue
onwards plus sample features |
Each volume includes:
- Reviews of orchid conservation projects and plants growing in their natural habitat around the world
- Profiles of orchid genera, species and hybrids
- First descriptions of new plants
- Techniques and know-how on growing and propagating orchids
- Information on shows, events and news from around the world
- Advice on a wide range of orchid problems
- Profiles of the latest RHS award-winning cultivars with cultural information.
Annual subscription:
- With New Hybrid List - to subscribe online click here
UK: £34
Overseas: £44
- Without New Hybrid List - to subscribe online click here
UK: £29
Overseas: £37
To print off an application form to subscribe today click here
For further information e-mail your name and address to: orchidreview@rhs.org.uk
Because The Orchid Review is bi-monthly you will be advised of the date of your first edition when your subscription is confirmed.
| Editor: | Isobyl la Croix orchidrevieweditor@rhs.org.uk |
| Editorial team: | Marina Jordan, Debbie Fitzgerald, Mike Grant, Ian Hodgson, Jean Stowe |
| Designers: | MacMonkey Creative |
| Consultants: | Phillip Cribb, Joyce Stewart, John David, Richard Warren |
| Advertising: | Louise Bowering, RHS Publications Ltd, 4th Floor, Churchgate, New Road, Peterborough PE1 1TT |
| Printed by: | The Friary Press, Bridport Road, Dorchester, Dorset DT1 1JL |
| ® The Royal Horticultural Society | |
| The Orchid Review is published by RHS Publications Ltd, 4th Floor, Churchgate, New Road, Peterborough PE1 1TT. Opinions expressed in this journal do not necessarily reflect those of the Editors or of the Royal Horticultural Society. |
|